Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology

tonguesIn this paper we explore the idea that pentecostalism is best supported by conjoining it to a postmodern, narrative epistemology in which everything is a text requiring interpretation. On this view, truth doesn’t consist in a set of uninterpreted facts that make the claims of Christianity true; rather, as James K. A. Smith says, truth emerges when there is a “fit” or proportionality between the Christian story and one’s affective and emotional life. We argue that pentecostals should reject this account of truth, since it leads to either a self-refuting story-relativism or the equally problematic fallacy of story-ism: favoring one’s own story over others without legitimate reason. In either case, we contend, the gospel itself is placed at risk.”

against

Finish reading “Against a Postmodern Pentecostal Epistemology” by Drs. Davis and Franks (@WPaulhere. Or click on the graphic to the right to download a free copy.

——-
If you would like to ask a question or make a comment about this post, please consult our Comment Policy here.

Advertisements